What's different about Safari? Unfortunately, Safari Content Blocking is severely limited compared to full-scale content blockers for other browsers. UPDATE: turns out, there's a better way! Learn how to block YouTube ads in Safari on iOS from our fresh article.īut with such approach user experience takes a real hit: either there's a noticeable delay before the video loads or there's a placeholder in place of the video ad:Ī few months ago YouTube started using the same way to show video ads to Chrome users, but we were able to handle it without much trouble. Simply speaking, we're blocking short videos (99.99% of them are ads). We found a solution that works for Safari on iOS, but it leaves much to be desired compared to other platforms and browsers. De facto, right now YouTube loads ad clips almost the same way as regular videos. As it turned out, YT has employed a new algorithm for showing ads to authorized users, and it had a negative effect on ad blocking quality. What's important, the complaints were specifically about watching YouTube inside the Safari browser. We're always happy to hear what you think of us - share your feedback in the blog comments, on social media, and on GitHub.Lately, we've been receiving an increasing amount of complaints about missed YouTube ads on iOS. We hope you'll enjoy the new version of AdGuard for Safari. If you want to know more, there's always a full list of changes in our GitHub repository. But you definitely won’t get confused by our new one: it’s actually not that new.īesides, we’ve updated the rules converter, scriptlets, and the Browser Assistant, and fixed some minor bugs. Apple asked us to remove the Safari icon from our logo - and we appreciate that. You might have noticed that our icon has been changed. This is three times more than before - which means that we’ll be able to apply the rules more flexibly, the filtering will become better, and users will have fewer chances to get into a situation where nothing works because the limit is exceeded. But it seems that we’ve changed their minds: their tests were successful and the rule limit for each content blocker was increased to 150,000 - for our six content blockers, that’s 900,000 in total. We had written repeatedly to Apple on increasing the limit - and they kept saying no, arguing that the performance would degrade. A small but important achievementīut we did actually succeed. If you had enabled multiple filters at once, some content blockers would get overrun too. During that, some rules from the filter didn't work and the filtering process failed.īesides, some filters contain directives to transfer rules to another content blocker. There are 50,000 rules in each of them - together it makes 300,000.īut even this division couldn't solve all the problems: users were getting notifications that the rules limit had been exceeded. We took advantage of it by grouping the filters into 6 content blockers: General, Privacy, Social, Security, Other, and Custom. But this restriction can actually be circumvented: an application can use more than one content blocker. If you wanted to turn on another filter, the limit was exceeded. First of all, 50,000 is really not enough: our Base Filter now has about 30,000 rules. This was causing an obvious inconvenience. We once wrote that Apple had banned content blockers from using more than 50,000 filtering rules at a time. Being able to block ads and protect against trackers well sometimes takes a lot of work: this time we argued with Apple about the filtering rule limit - and succeeded! Now let us tell you how it was.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |